Case Studies
Every invisible problem follows the same pattern.
A signal is ignored. A gap widens. A cost accumulates. The only variable is whether you see it before or after it becomes someone else's leverage.
The £47M acquisition. The £3.2M in hidden liabilities you almost missed.
When supplier contracts, performance warranties, and hidden obligations contradict the financial model, the gap between what the seller promised and what the records show is where deal value evaporates. We reconstruct the true obligation timeline so you see exactly what you are actually buying — before you sign.
The £2.4M fraudulent claim. The timeline that proved it.
When a claimant's narrative contradicts the chronological record, the gap between their story and what actually happened is where fraud hides. We reconstruct the true timeline so you see exactly what the evidence shows — before the payout hits your account.
The £180M program. The 18-month delay. The timeline that explained it.
When a pharmaceutical program timeline contradicts regulatory submissions and trial data commitments, the gap between what was submitted to the regulator and what actually happened is where compliance exposure lives. We reconstruct the true program chronology so you see exactly what the regulatory record shows — before the audit.
The £85M development. The stop-work order. The timeline that triggered it.
When a development timeline contradicts planning compliance, permit conditions, and environmental assessment requirements, the gap between what was promised to regulators and what construction actually delivered is where project liability lives. We reconstruct the true compliance timeline so you see exactly what the regulatory record shows — before the notice is served.
The £840K unfair dismissal claim. The HR records that defended it.
When an employee's dismissal narrative contradicts the performance record and management timeline, the gap between what was communicated to the employee and what the documentation shows actually happened is where tribunal exposure lives. We reconstruct the true HR timeline so you see exactly what your records actually prove — before the hearing.
Your campaign metrics say "performing." Your revenue says otherwise.
When CTR rises but conversion collapses, the gap between internal reporting and commercial reality is where budget disappears. We reconstruct the timeline so you see the moment the numbers diverged — before the next board meeting.
Your bid says you can deliver. Can you prove it?
Final-stage bids are won or lost on confidence, not capability. When the client panel compares three equally qualified firms, the one with a reconstructed delivery record — showing what actually happened on past projects — is the one that feels safe to appoint.
You have 120 suppliers. How many can prove their carbon data is real?
The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism is not a future problem — it is a quarterly reporting obligation. When your supplier declarations don't match their actual emissions data, the gap becomes your liability. We reconstruct what your supply chain records actually say.
You sell products containing palm oil. Can you prove none of it came from deforested land?
The EU Deforestation Regulation requires verifiable proof — not supplier assurance letters — that every commodity in your supply chain is deforestation-free. With 80 suppliers and complex sourcing chains, the gap between what you're told and what's provable is where regulatory risk lives.
Your client's case history is scattered across 47 documents. The Home Office sees a gap.
Immigration applications are won or lost on the timeline. When passport stamps, utility bills, bank statements, and employer letters tell slightly different stories about residency, travel, and presence — the caseworker sees inconsistency. We reconstruct what the records actually show, in sequence, with the gaps made visible before they become refusal reasons.
Your influencer said the right things. The record says otherwise.
When disclosures are inconsistent across platforms, jurisdictions, and formats, the gap between what was posted and what is required is where regulatory exposure lives. We reconstruct the record so you see exactly what can be defended — before a regulator does.
What does it actually cost?
Start with a £149 Check. Pilot engagements from £2,500. Scale with custom Risk Radar monitoring.
Professional-grade analysis. Flat fee, no surprises. Hours, not weeks.
Click here to find outDon't see your scenario?
The pattern is the same across every industry. A signal diverges from a claim. The gap has a cost. We find it.
Get your diagnosis